[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: IP Address in the ACM (Was: Comments on AccessControlModel- BNF)

To: robert byrne <robert.byrne@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: IP Address in the ACM (Was: Comments on AccessControlModel- BNF)
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 18:42:41 -0700
Cc: Paul Leach <paulle@Exchange.Microsoft.com>, ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
In-reply-to: <3ACDC324.94579852@Sun.COM>
References: <5.0.2.1.0.20010404130816.00b02a10@127.0.0.1> <5.0.2.1.0.20010405074208.01f6e7a0@127.0.0.1> <5.0.2.1.0.20010405083950.01f6a670@127.0.0.1>

Robert,

Given that the document allows additional subjects, there are
already interoperability issues of the nature you seem to be
concerned with.  If someone specified a "foo" subject to a
server that doesn't support the "foo" subject, an error should
be returned.  That ensures the client understands this server
doesn't support the "foo" subject.  How is that different for
the server returning a error for the IP-Address subject?

Kurt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IP Address in the ACM (Was: Comments onAccessControlModel- BNF)
  - From: robert byrne <robert.byrne@Sun.COM>

References:
- RE: IP Address in the ACM (Was: Comments on Access Control Model - BNF)
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: IP Address in the ACM (Was: Comments on Access ControlModel - BNF)
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: IP Address in the ACM (Was: Comments on AccessControlModel - BNF)
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: IP Address in the ACM (Was: Comments on AccessControlModel- BNF)
  - From: robert byrne <robert.byrne@Sun.COM>

Prev by Date: Re: createSaslClient by the Java LDAP API
Next by Date: Your Status
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread