[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: imperatives (Was: WG last call on the Java API)

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: imperatives (Was: WG last call on the Java API)
From: Rob Weltman <robw@coscend.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 08:56:14 -0800
Cc: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
References: <5.0.2.1.0.20010313161415.00ac9870@router.boolean.net>

"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
> 
> Why are RFC 2119 imperatives not used?
> 
> Kurt

  Aren't they?

"Implementations of the API MUST ensure that the LDAPConnection class 
is thread-safe. Other classes and methods MAY be thread-safe and the 
implementor MUST indicate which classes and methods are thread-safe."

  I guess there are instances where the MUST/MAY/SHOULD words are not in all caps, but the usage is as prescribed by RFC 2119 as far as I know.

Rob

References:
- imperatives (Was: WG last call on the Java API)
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Unbind and related questions (WG last call on the Java API)
Next by Date: ARE YOU GOING TO OWE TAX ON APRIL 15th?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread