Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldapext-locate-05.txt

[Roland Hedberg <roland@catalogix.se>]

On Friday 09 March 2001 18:46, RL 'Bob' Morgan wrote:
> > On Friday 09 March 2001 03:15, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> > > What are the outstanding technical issues in regards to
> > > this I-D?  I assume there must be some unresolved issue
> > > as this I-D is on the IETF#50 agenda.  However, given that the
> > > two recent enquiries requesting status and outstanding
> > > issues came up empty, I cannot even imagine what they
> > > might be.  Can someone provide a clue?
> >
> > I had the impression that the topic Bob brought up at the last IETF
> > meeting was not completely resolved. If that isn't the case I'll gladly
> > remove it from the agenda.
>
> It is still my impression that this doc will not get thru
> IESG/IETF-Last-Call with the current DN->DNS mapping algorithm.  But the
> way it is does represent the consensus of the ldapext WG, so probably the
> best way to get real discussion is to forward it to IESG.
>
> Tim Polk, one of the PKI-oriented folks who is prepared to make the case
> for changing the mapping algorithm, is willing to come to the ldapext
> meeting to talk about this.  So I suggest we use the slot for this
> discussion.

Good, I'll leave it in then !

-- Roland