RE: Revised Matched Values Draft

["Ramsay, Ron" <Ron.Ramsay@ca.com>]

You got your proposal through?

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Legg [mailto:steven.legg@adacel.com.au]
Sent: Friday, 14 July 2000 16:33
To: 'Kurt D. Zeilenga'
Cc: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Subject: RE: Revised Matched Values Draft




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kurt D. Zeilenga [mailto:Kurt@OpenLDAP.org]
> Sent: Thursday, 13 July 2000 3:05
> To: Lloyd, Alan
> Cc: Miklos, Sue A.; Bruce Greenblatt; d.w.chadwick@salford.ac.uk;
> ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
> Subject: RE: Revised Matched Values Draft
> 
> 
> At 11:38 PM 7/12/00 +1000, Lloyd, Alan wrote:
> >Isnt it amazing that the reason for LDAP was that DAP was 
> too complex - and
> >here we are (years later) adding more complexity to LDAP 
> beyond that of
> >DAP..:-)
> > regards alan
> 
> The primary complexity of DAP that LDAP removed was need to implement
> the ISO protocol stack.

Even the OSI stack can be avoided now. The 2000 edition of X.500 contains
the provisions for mapping the protocols directly onto TCP/IP.

Regards,
Steven