[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Changelog entries draft. Do not seem to find it.

To: ggood@netscape.com (Gordon Good)
Subject: Re: Changelog entries draft. Do not seem to find it.
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 10:29:56 -0800
Cc: Natarajan SK <sknatarajan@novell.com>, ietf-ldapext@netscape.com, Savitha R <RSAVITHA@novell.com>, ietf-ldup@imc.org
In-reply-to: <38BD5BA9.57715393@netscape.com>
References: <s8bc9d4a.048@prv-mail20.provo.novell.com>
Resent-date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 10:30:12 -0800 (PST)
Resent-from: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Resent-message-id: <QqF-GB.A.L9D.qGWv4@glacier>
Resent-sender: ietf-ldapext-request@netscape.com

At 10:04 AM 3/1/00 -0800, Gordon Good wrote:
>While I'm happy to resurrect the changelog draft and discuss publishing it as a standards-track document (informational,
>probably), it's not going to be a part of  the LDUP specification.

I would support publication of the Changelog draft as an
Informational RFC as it would document existing practices.
The document would have to be amended, of course, to contain
appropriate statements concerning IETF work in this area.

Kurt

References:
- Changelog entries draft. Do not seem to find it.
  - From: Natarajan SK <sknatarajan@novell.com>
- Re: Changelog entries draft. Do not seem to find it.
  - From: ggood@netscape.com (Gordon Good)

Prev by Date: Re: Changelog entries draft. Do not seem to find it.
Next by Date: Re: Changelog entries draft. Do not seem to find it.
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread