[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: The 'any' attribute type

To: Jim Sermersheim <JIMSE@novell.com>
Subject: Re: The 'any' attribute type
From: Mark Smith <mcs@netscape.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 19:12:10 -0400
Cc: M.Wahl@INNOSOFT.COM, ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Organization: Netscape Communications
References: <s7c69541.010@prv-mail20.provo.novell.com>
Resent-date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 16:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-from: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Resent-message-id: <"UxP7TD.A.0gF.Otxx3"@glacier>
Resent-sender: ietf-ldapext-request@netscape.com

Jim Sermersheim wrote:.
>
> ...
> The attribute type option I want to use this with, is one that affects
> the transmission of any value, regardless of syntax.

I'll reserve final judgment until I see your proposal, but offhand such
an attribute type option scares me a bit (it sounds like using it will
be a big change for clients and servers).  I am not a big fan of ;binary
even.

-- 
Mark Smith
iPlanet Directory Architect / Sun-Netscape Alliance
My words are my own, not my employer's.   Got LDAP?

References:
- Re: The 'any' attribute type
  - From: Jim Sermersheim <JIMSE@novell.com>

Prev by Date: Re: The 'any' attribute type
Next by Date: Re: The 'any' attribute type
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread