[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: FW: BLITS (3.3.1.4.3) Inconsistency w/ RFC 2251 (Section4.2.3 .)
Could an I-D be created to track all changes to RFC 2251?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kurt D. Zeilenga [SMTP:Kurt@OpenLDAP.Org]
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 1999 5:22 AM
> To: Mark Wahl
> Cc: Michael Armijo (Exchange); 'ietf-ldapext@netscape.com';
> 'directory@opengroup.org'
> Subject: Re: FW: BLITS (3.3.1.4.3) Inconsistency w/ RFC 2251
> (Section4.2.3.)
>
> Mark Wahl wrote:
> > I agree that invalidDNSyntax should be added to the list of probable
> > result codes in a bind response in the next update to RFC 2251.
>
> Is it a "probable" list of result codes or a list of the list
> of the all the allowed result codes for this operation.
>
> Kurt