RE: FW: BLITS (3.3.1.4.3) Inconsistency w/ RFC 2251 (Section4.2.3 .)

["Michael Armijo (Exchange)" <micharm@Exchange.Microsoft.com>]

The way it reads now sounds like it is the 'allowed' list.  Particularly the
"will be one of" wording.  

From 4.2.3. Bind Response:

   "If the bind was successful, the resultCode will be success, therwise
   it will be one of:"

Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: Kurt D. Zeilenga [mailto:Kurt@OpenLDAP.Org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 1999 12:22 PM
To: Mark Wahl
Cc: Michael Armijo (Exchange); 'ietf-ldapext@netscape.com';
'directory@opengroup.org'
Subject: Re: FW: BLITS (3.3.1.4.3) Inconsistency w/ RFC 2251
(Section4.2.3.)


Mark Wahl wrote:
> I agree that invalidDNSyntax should be added to the list of probable
> result codes in a bind response in the next update to RFC 2251.

Is it a "probable" list of result codes or a list of the list
of the all the allowed result codes for this operation.

Kurt