Re: LDAP C API draft v3: Small suggestion

[Mark Smith <mcs@netscape.com>]

JR Heisey wrote:
> 
> How about defining
> 
> #define LDAP_OPT_EXT_BASE           0x4000 /* to 0x7fff inclusive */
> 
> in section 10.2, the last paragraph on page 20.

Okay with me, but how do you envision applications using this?  Perhaps
to  compare a given option to see if it is a private or experimental
extension vs. a standard one?  I am not sure how much value that has in
practice.

Also, I'd prefer a less cryptic name for the macro.  Perhaps
LDAP_OPT_PRIVATE_EXTENSION_BASE or similar.

-- 
Mark Smith
Netscape Communications Corp. / Directory Server Engineering
"Got LDAP?"