RE: proposed charter revision

[Alan Lloyd <Alan.Lloyd@OpenDirectory.com.au>]

Is there a danger of putting up a standard that contains "a start" and
an "end" without knowing what the detail is  in between!

It strikes me the easy bit is statrt and end, but it has little value
without the magic bit - so why standardise it.

regards alan

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	merrells@netscape.com 
> Sent:	Friday, June 04, 1999 4:08 AM
> To:	capple@att.com
> Cc:	ietf-ldup@imc.org; johns@cisco.com; paf@swip.net;
> moore@cs.utk.edu; ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
> Subject:	Re: proposed charter revision
> 
> 
> Chris Apple wrote:
> > 
> 
> I think that the initial submit of the architecture document is
> missing.
> >
> >  Apr 1999 Revise I-D on LDAPv3 Replication Architecture.
> > 
> >  Aug 1999 Revise I-D on LDAPv3 Replication Architecture.
> > 
> >  Oct 1999 LDAPv3 Replication Architecture I-D goes to WG Last Call
> >           as Informational.
> 
> These dates seem fine to me.
> 
> I think that we should promote this document from informational to
> proposed standard since it actually does contain some stuff that
> has to be implementaed... such as the start and end repl extended
> operations.
> 
> John