Re: new name for signed directory operations draft

[Bruce Greenblatt <bgreenblatt@directory-applications.com>]

I like Jim's suggestion better than my original one.  So, if there are no
objections, I'll send out an update with a new title...

Bruce

At 10:33 AM 1/15/99 -0700, you wrote:
>You could shorten it to "An LDAP Control and Schema for Holding Operation
> Signatures" if you don't mind giving up the part about storing.
>
>
>>>> Bruce Greenblatt <bgreenblatt@directory-applications.com> 1/15/99
9:48:22 AM >>>
>The minutes of the orlando meeting indicated that a new name for the signed
>directory operations draft was desired.  Here's my best shot at it.  
>
>"An LDAP Control for Holding Operation Signatures, and an Accompanying
>Schema for Storing Them".
>
>How's that?  Hopefully, this is more indicative of the content of the
>draft.  Any other suggestions will be warmly received.  Apologies again for
>not being able to attend!
>
>Bruce
>================================================
>Bruce Greenblatt             
>bgreenblatt@directory-applications.com 
>http://www.directory-applications.com 
>================================================
>
>
>
================================================
Bruce Greenblatt             
bgreenblatt@directory-applications.com
http://www.directory-applications.com
================================================