[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Clarification of RootDSE information retrieval required

To: Mark C Smith <mcs@netscape.com>, ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Subject: Re: Clarification of RootDSE information retrieval required
From: dboreham@netscape.com (David Boreham)
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 09:01:12 -0800
References: <G5JA8AAAAAAJ9IAAABYQACiMOLwb9U*@MHS> <36559208.A4D0B9E6@netscape.com>
Resent-date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 08:57:47 -0800 (PST)
Resent-from: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Resent-message-id: <"qrsEV.0.Eh2.9-PLs"@glacier>
Resent-sender: ietf-ldapext-request@netscape.com

Mark C Smith wrote:

information is available, is easier to debug, and so on. In the
interest of full and fair disclosure, I will admit that Netscape's LDAP
server implementation already behaves this way.

As do many other vendors' implementations.

References:
- Clarification of RootDSE information retrieval required
  - From: Briscoe AR <A.R.Briscoe@MAN05T1.wins.icl.co.uk> (Tel \(MAN05 2405\))
- Re: Clarification of RootDSE information retrieval required
  - From: mcs@netscape.com (Mark C Smith)

Prev by Date: Re: Clarification of RootDSE information retrieval required
Next by Date: Re: Abstract object class
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread