[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Abstract object class




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Wahl [mailto:M.Wahl@INNOSOFT.COM]
> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 1998 11:57 AM
> To: Paul Leach
> Cc: 'Ed Reed'; senthil_k1@catsglobal.com; ietf-ldapext@netscape.com;
> osidirectory@az05.bull.com
> Subject: Re: Abstract object class
> 

I'm not sure what specifically you are referring to in your comments.
> 
> String representations are not guaranteed to be unique across 
> schemas.

String representations of what? The class name?
  
> The numeric OID form should be unique.  Therefore you can use 
> the numeric
> OID forms specifying an object class to ensure that a 
> specific schema is
> referenced.

If I changed my comments so that everywhere "foo" was used, it's OID was
used instead, would that fix the problem?

Paul