[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: ldap PICS
> Are you saying that if DISP was a separate standard, all the required MAYs
> in its specification would be MUSTs, and there would be no need for
> the ISP?
Harald
Sorry for the delay. I missed your reply. No I am not saying what you do above,
but rather, a few MAYs would have been MUST and the majority would
probably have remained MAYs, so there would still be a need for an ISP for
DISP, even if it were a stand alone standard
David
***************************************************
David Chadwick
IT Institute, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT
Tel +44 161 295 5351 Fax +44 161 745 8169
Mobile +44 370 957 287
Email D.W.Chadwick@iti.salford.ac.uk
Home Page http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/chadwick.htm
Understanding X.500 http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/X500.htm
X.500/LDAP Seminars http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/seminars.htm
***************************************************
- References:
- RE: ldap PICS
- From: "David Chadwick" <d.w.chadwick@zetnet.co.uk>
- RE: ldap PICS
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald.Alvestrand@maxware.no>