[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: comments on draft-ietf-ldapext-authmeth-01.txt

To: howes@netscape.com (Tim Howes)
Subject: Re: comments on draft-ietf-ldapext-authmeth-01.txt
From: Jeff.Hodges@stanford.edu
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 11:24:56 -0800
Cc: Mark Wahl <M.Wahl@critical-angle.com>, Jeff.Hodges@stanford.edu, Bob.Morgan@stanford.edu, ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Delivered-to: ldapext-archive@critical-angle.com
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 25 Mar 1998 11:04:26 -0800
Resent-date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 11:25:11 -0800 (PST)
Resent-from: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Resent-message-id: <"-Oil-1.0.8W4.LeL6r"@glacier>
Resent-sender: ietf-ldapext-request@netscape.com

Just to test my understanding..

>  Explicitly state in the document
> that other schemes can easily be encapsulated in the DN
> syntax. 

By this I presume you're alluding to something akin to..

  One may provide for mapping authorization (authz) identities which are 
expressed in syntactic forms *other* than DNs, by creating entries for the 
appropriate entities and providing the DN-to-foreign-authz-id mapping in those 
entries, per the recommendations in Section X.X of [docRefHere].

?

thanks,

Jeff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: comments on draft-ietf-ldapext-authmeth-01.txt
  - From: howes@netscape.com (Tim Howes)

Prev by Date: more comments on authmeth-01 draft
Next by Date: Re: comments on draft-ietf-ldapext-authmeth-01.txt
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread