RE: Scrolling vs Paging (Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-s implepaged-02.txt)

[Chris Weider <cweider@microsoft.com>]

I'm not disagreeing that the Virtual List stuff will provide a superset of
the functionality. The question is, when? People are already using the
simple paged results control. I think it's more prudent to standardize that
now rather than tell developers to wait for a 'better' (notice the quote
marks) control.
Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Steve Kille [SMTP:S.Kille@isode.com]
> Sent:	Friday, February 27, 1998 7:25 AM
> To:	dboreham@netscape.com
> Cc:	ietf-ldapext@netscape.com; howes@netscape.com;
> ietf-asid@netscape.com
> Subject:	Re: Scrolling vs Paging (Re: LAST CALL:
> draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt)
> 
> This certainly adds weight to my argument to throw simple paged results
> into the bin.
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> 
>  >From:  dboreham@netscape.com (David Boreham)
>  >To:    <ietf-ldapext@netscape.com>, "Steve Kille" <S.Kille@isode.com>
>  >Subject: Re: Scrolling vs Paging (Re: LAST CALL:
> draft-ietf-asid-lda
> pv3-simplepaged-02.txt)
>  >Date:  Thu, 26 Feb 1998 20:21:51 -0500
> 
>  >>1) Simple Paged Results.
>  >>
>  >>2) Scrolling View (Dave Boreham)
>  >
>  >Note that one design goal for (2) is that
>  >it should provide a superset of the functions
>  >of (1). Thus proponents of (1) could be
>  >well served by (2). 
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >