RE: Scrolling vs Paging (Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-s implepaged-02.txt)

["Salter, Thomas A" <Thomas.Salter@unisys.com>]

I certainly concur with this.  We don't need two different controls
which accomplish the same thing, but in different ways.  If there is
some need to subset the functionality, then that can be addressed in the
Scrolling View document.

> ----------
> From: 	Steve Kille[SMTP:S.Kille@isode.com]
> Sent: 	Friday, February 27, 1998 10:25 AM
> To: 	dboreham@netscape.com
> Cc: 	ietf-ldapext@netscape.com; howes@netscape.com;
> ietf-asid@netscape.com
> Subject: 	Re: Scrolling vs Paging (Re: LAST CALL:
> draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt)
> 
> This certainly adds weight to my argument to throw simple paged
> results
> into the bin.
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> 
>  >From:  dboreham@netscape.com (David Boreham)
>  >To:    <ietf-ldapext@netscape.com>, "Steve Kille"
> <S.Kille@isode.com>
>  >Subject: Re: Scrolling vs Paging (Re: LAST CALL:
> draft-ietf-asid-lda
> pv3-simplepaged-02.txt)
>  >Date:  Thu, 26 Feb 1998 20:21:51 -0500
> 
>  >>1) Simple Paged Results.
>  >>
>  >>2) Scrolling View (Dave Boreham)
>  >
>  >Note that one design goal for (2) is that
>  >it should provide a superset of the functions
>  >of (1). Thus proponents of (1) could be
>  >well served by (2). 
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>