Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
This is incorrect. This implies that if the rule applies to
X:
( 1.1.1 NAME 'X' SYNTAX 1.1.0 )
that Y:
( 1.1.2 NAME 'Y' SUP X )
need not listed. Y should be listed in this case as
if the rule applies to X it should apply to Y because Y is
a subtype of X. That is, the implementation is not excused
from listing Y because it is subtype of some listed type.
Instead, the server is obligated to list Y as the rule applies
to subtypes of X.
Glad to read this provided my understanding of your words is correct...
Ciao, Michael.
-- Michael Ströder E-Mail: michael@stroeder.com http://www.stroeder.com