Hi Mark, It is in the RFC Editor's queue, and it will be done before this one. So if you put in a reference to the i-d, it will be updated to the RFC number. Ted
Larry Masinter wrote:It would be nicer if this document were rewritten to be consistent with RFC2396bis, which made some changes to the BNF from RFC 2396.
draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-07.txt
Good point.
A quick look at the above I-D tells me it would not be too difficult to change draft-ietf-ldapbis-url-08.txt to reference the above I-D (but I have not tried to make the required edits, so I am not 100% sure).
The question is whether the LDAPBis documents should reference the RFC2396bis draft or continue to reference RFCs 2396 and 2732. How close to "done" is RFC2396bis?
-Mark