Re: Last Call: 'LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator' to Proposed Standard

[Mark Smith <mcs@pearlcrescent.com>]

Larry Masinter wrote:
> It would be nicer if this document were rewritten to
> be consistent with RFC2396bis, which made some
> changes to the BNF from RFC 2396.
>
>          draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-07.txt

Good point.

A quick look at the above I-D tells me it would not be too difficult to 
change draft-ietf-ldapbis-url-08.txt to reference the above I-D (but I 
have not tried to make the required edits, so I am not 100% sure).

The question is whether the LDAPBis documents should reference the 
RFC2396bis draft or continue to reference RFCs 2396 and 2732.  How close 
to "done" is RFC2396bis?

-Mark