[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: reframing the Empty IA5 string discussion

To: Jim Sermersheim <jimse@novell.com>
Subject: Re: reframing the Empty IA5 string discussion
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 23:27:22 +0100
Cc: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org, Kurt@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <s193181d.082@sinclair.provo.novell.com>
References: <s193181d.082@sinclair.provo.novell.com>

Jim Sermersheim writes:
> After re-reading RFC 2251, I changed my mind, and now I prefer 2B as I
> think most people would interpret a space-only string to either be
> leading or trailing whitespace, thus ignored.

Which part of rfc2251?  I can't find a relevant "space" in it.

-- 
Hallvard

References:
- Re: reframing the Empty IA5 string discussion
  - From: "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@novell.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Stringprep Considered Harmful
Next by Date: Re: [filter] interpretting presence verses substring with whitespace
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread