Re: absent matchingRule (was Re: protocol-27 comments #3)

[Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>]

Jim Sermersheim writes:
>>>> Which means just (:dn:=foo) is not allowed. Maybe the draft should
>>>> suggest that one can use (1.1:dn:=foo).
>>
>> Looking at the description of dnAttributes under extensibleMatch in
>> 4.5.1. Search Request, it returns TRUE if a DN attribute matches foo -
>> regardless of Undefined or False from the rest of the filter. 
> 
> Hmm, to me it looks like the attribute type is unknown, thus the entire
> filter item would be Undefined.

You are right.

-- 
Hallvard