Re: A few question regarding schema

[Alex Karasulu <aok123@bellsouth.net>]

Michael Ströder wrote:

> Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
> > 2). Also as a general rule, most schema objects have a unique OID 
> > assigned to them.  The only exception to this rule are matchingRuleUses.
>
>
> Matching Rule Use is not the only "exception". E.g. check out DIT 
> content rules and name forms where the OID of the structural object 
> class the DIT content rule or name form applies to is used in the 
> schema element declaration.
Is this still the case for nameForms?  Looking at [MODELS 
<http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-11.txt>] 
section 4.1.7.2 on NameForms I see that it uses a unique OID 
specifically assigned to the nameForm here:
...
"where:

	<numericoid> is object identifier which identifies this name form;" ....

Could you clarify? Also what would be the cardinality of the 
relationship between dITContentRules and their respective structural 
objectClasses?  Likewise what would the cardinality be for nameForms if 
there is an issue with the draft?

Thanks again,
Alex