"LDAP exchange" (was: Misuse of the term "association" in [Protocol])

[Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>]

Ramsay, Ron writes:
> I note that you are not listening to me, and I guess that it OK. But
> this problem will not go away until you drop this strange "LDAP
> exchange" thing. It DOES NOT, at least in English, mean the ongoing
> exchange of protocol data.

Nor is it defined that way in [Protocol].  Did you see my message
  http://www.openldap.org/lists/ietf-ldapbis/200410/msg00002.html
?

> The only chance for sanity here is to keep "association" and drop
> "exchange".

That would be wrong, since "association" is defined as something
different.  We could rename the term "LDAP exchange" to something else
(which would get the current definition of "LDAP exchange") after making
Kurt's changes.  If you wish to suggest a better term, read this thread
first:

  http://www.openldap.org/lists/ietf-ldapbis/200404/msg00023.html

Personally I prefer several other terms over "LDAP exchange", but I
don't feel strongly about it.

-- 
Hallvard