[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Misuse of the term "association" in [Protocol]

To: "Ramsay, Ron" <Ron.Ramsay@ca.com>
Subject: RE: Misuse of the term "association" in [Protocol]
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 22:09:25 -0700
Cc: <ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <1395B4B334FCC143B36AF788E68B638101DD5650@ausyms21.ca.com>
References: <1395B4B334FCC143B36AF788E68B638101DD5650@ausyms21.ca.com>

At 06:36 PM 10/3/2004, Ramsay, Ron wrote:
>I note that you are not listening to me, and I guess that it OK. But this problem will not go away until you drop this strange "LDAP exchange" thing. 

I previously responded to comments regarding the "LDAP exchange"
term.  I see no reason to repeat my comments (especially since
Hallvard did).

In this thread, I have made a suggestion intended to address
a separate issue, consistent use of the term "LDAP association".

Kurt

References:
- RE: Misuse of the term "association" in [Protocol]
  - From: "Ramsay, Ron" <Ron.Ramsay@ca.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Misuse of the term "association" in [Protocol]
Next by Date: "LDAP exchange" (was: Misuse of the term "association" in [Protocol])
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread