|
I've checked most of the authmeth transition table for accuracy, and I
believe it is close to complete. I still have an action item to do a final
review, but I'd appreciate additional eyes looking at it. The idea to split it
into TLS and non-TLS, either via two tables or via two areas of the same table
is one that I'll seriously consider.
Roger
>>> Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> 11/5/2003 5:13:29 AM >>> [Sorry if this is a duplicate.] Have anyone read and checked the authmeth transition table? Will anyone use it? Unless it can be converted to graphics, I think it would be better to replace it with a textual summary of authmeth actions. Failing that, I agree with whoever suggested to split it into two tables: TLS actions (start TLS/close) and non-TLS actions (bind). Each table will be much more readable if they are smaller and contain less state. (Besides, that might make it easier to convert it to graphics.) -- Hallvard |