Re: LDAP DN: static table/registry approach

[mcs@netscape.com (Mark C Smith)]

Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn details the "static table" approach
> previously adopted by the WG. It was recently updated, see below.
> draft-zeilenga-ldapbis-rfc2253 details a "registry" approach.
> I had intended to update it as well, but due an error on my part,
> this update will not be announced until after IETF#56.  However,
> I think the revision currently available is good enough to
> consider the following question:
>
> Should the WG pursue the "registry" approach as discussed in
> draft-zeilenga-ldapbis-rfc2253 in favor of the "static table"
> approach discussed in draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn?

I prefer the registry approach, since I think there is some pressure 
from real users to avoid OIDs in LDAP DNs.

Maybe I missed it, but would this be a new IANA registry?

-Mark