[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Models: Structural Object Class

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: Models: Structural Object Class
From: mcs@netscape.com (Mark C Smith)
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 14:39:13 -0500
Cc: Jim Sermersheim <jimse@novell.com>, ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.0.20030128091704.01a0d9d8@127.0.0.1>
References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030128091704.01a0d9d8@127.0.0.1>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212

Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:

Personally, I don't have a problem adding both of these as they
address technical omissions.  One, however, could consider the
above to be 'LDAP non-"core" schema' [LDAPBIS charter].  This
charter issue I defer to Bob (who acts as sole chair in regards
to this I-D).

I view both of these (structuralObjectClass and governingStructureRule) as non-core schema (extensions to LDAPv3, not core). That does not mean they are not useful to some applications though.

--
Mark Smith
Netscape Directory Product Development
My words are my own, not my employer's.

References:
- Re: Models: Structural Object Class
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Models: Subclassing
Next by Date: Re: Models: Naming Contexts
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread