Re: objectIdentifierMatch on ambiguous name

[Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>]

I wrote:
>Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
>>> All syntaxes that use OIDs that I can see come
>>> with a definition which says which OID name space they apply to,
>> 
>> Really?  I think that most of the definitions of name space are
>> actually quite ambiguous.  Consider the assertion (objectClass=foo) in
>> a subtree search where different parts of the subtree are controlled
>> by different subschemas, each with a different definition for foo.
>> (Let's assume the server holds the whole subtree for now.) Is the
>> server to map foo on a per entry basis, or once for the whole
>> operation?
>
> per entry, I think.

...though I wish I didn't:-)
In any case, I think the answer to that question belongs in
4.5. Search Operation in [Protocol], not in [Models].

-- 
Hallvard