[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
strange uniqueMemberMatch
[Syntaxes] 5.2.21 (uniqueMemberMatch) says:
The rule evaluates to TRUE if and only if the <distinguishedName>
components of the assertion value and attribute value match according
to the distinguishedNameMatch rule and the <BitString> component is
absent from the attribute value or matches the <BitString> component
of the assertion value according to the bitStringMatch rule.
Thus, assertion value cn=foo#'0101'B matches attribute value cn=foo.
Is that intentional? X.520 paragraph 6.2.11 says the same thing.
--
Hallvard