[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-03.txt



At 05:25 AM 2002-11-22, Norbert Klasen wrote:
>- the rhs of list definitions was optional, which would allow an empty list (e.g. "NAME ()").

This form is not used and likely will cause problems in some parsers.

>- BTW: The current form of *list definitions allows a list to only contain one element. This allows both "NAME 'cn'" and "NAME ('cn')". Is this intended?

Yes.

I concur with the other changes suggested.

Kurt