Re: Another problem with abandon

[Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>]

I wrote:
> I don't think so.  It has the effect that any definition of LDAP for a
> protocol which doesn't guarantee order, must reserve message IDs of
> abandoned operations until the next bind.

Oops.  It must reserve the message IDs of abandoned operations, period.
The server might receive the abandon after the bind.

-- 
Hallvard