[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: draft-ietf-ldapbis-filter-03.txt

At 06:38 AM 2002-11-15, Mark C Smith wrote:
>Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>>Why was section 6 "String Search Filter Definition" changed to
>>say that "all octets greater than 0x7f" must be escaped?
>>Shouldn't that at least be "MUST" esacpe them when generating filters,
>>but SHOULD (or MAY) recognize them unescaped, for backwards
>>compatibility?
>
>That change was the result of working group last call comments made by Steven Legg (but I am the one who wrote the text).

So that everyone change refresh their memory...

Steven's comment:
  http://www.openldap.org/lists/ietf-ldapbis/200105/msg00027.html

and Mark's subsequent reply:
  http://www.openldap.org/lists/ietf-ldapbis/200106/msg00002.html

and last call summary:
  http://www.openldap.org/lists/ietf-ldapbis/200106/msg00003.html

Kurt