[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: ;binary migration solution
Mark C Smith wrote:
But your proposal does allow new
servers that do not need to support old clients to NOT implement ;binary.
I retract the above comment. Your proposal is that new servers must
support old clients. This is quite a mess from an interoperability
point of view. If all servers support the old and new method and if the
functionality is equivalent, why would a client implementor ever bother
using the new way?