[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: DN-alt issues

To: Scott Seligman <scott.seligman@sun.com>
Subject: Re: DN-alt issues
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 12:46:22 -0700
Cc: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <gdv8z32eman.fsf@SFBay.Sun.COM>
References: <"Kurt D. Zeilenga"'s message of Sat, 17 Aug 2002 13:58:29 -0700> <5.1.0.14.0.20020816191252.03db15b8@127.0.0.1>

At 11:27 AM 2002-08-19, Scott Seligman wrote:
>It is inappropriate to change this in a BIS update, where the goal is
>clarifying an existing spec, not designing a better spec.

I don't think we've redesigned the DN string representation.
The representation still allows arbitrary type name strings
to be used.

We've added recommendations which narrow the use of a
particular feature to improve interoperability between
independently developed implementations.  This addition,
IMO, is quite appropriate.

Kurt

References:
- DN-alt issues
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: DN-alt issues
  - From: Scott Seligman <scott.seligman@sun.com>

Prev by Date: Directory Best Practice Guide
Next by Date: Re: DN-alt issues
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread