IESG comments on draft-ietf-ldapbis-ldapv3-ts-00.txt

[Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>]

Can you please look at these things?

  paf

---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Date: torsdag 21 februari 2002 17.39 +0100
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ldapbis-ldapv3-ts-00.txt

I get the point, and agree with your view. Let me pass this to the authors.

  paf

--On 2002-02-21 09.06 -0500 Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> E.g.:
> 
>> The term "LDAPv3" MAY be used to informally refer to the protocol speci-
>> fied by this set of RFCs. The LDAPv3 protocol suite, as defined here,
>> SHOULD be formally identified in other documents by a normative refer-
>> ence to this document.
> 
>> Other RFCs (and perhaps Internet-Drafts) MAY specify extensions to
>> LDAPv3.  Nomenclature denoting such combinations of LDAPv3-plus-
>> extension(s) is not defined by this document, and MAY be defined in some
>> future document(s).
> 
> My suggestion would be to just downcase all usage of the terms.
> 
> Your call if you think this is worth making an issue of.
 

---------- End Forwarded Message ----------