[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Separator in DITStructureRuleDescription


Likewise for us (not yet implemented).

Given a choice, it would have been nice if '$' were used for the separator (consistency), but having a implementation that already uses spaces, I understand and agree with the direction that any reasonable separator is fine.
Regards,
Tim Hahn

Internet: hahnt@us.ibm.com
Internal: Timothy Hahn/Endicott/IBM@IBMUS or IBMUSM00(HAHNT)
phone: 607.752.6388     tie-line: 8/852.6388
fax: 607.752.3681


"Jim Sermersheim" <JIMSE@novell.com>
Sent by: owner-ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org

12/18/2001 10:28 AM

       
        To:        <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>, <ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org>
        cc:        
        Subject:        Re: Separator in DITStructureRuleDescription

       


not yet implemented here, so any reasonable separator is fine with us.

Jim

>>> "Steven Legg" <steven.legg@adacel.com.au> 12/17/01 11:10PM >>>

Folks,

It was noted during the ldapbis working group meeting in SLC that
a separator between rule identifiers in <ruleidentifierlist> is
missing
from the ABNF for DITStructureRuleDescription, Section 6.33, RFC 2252.

RFC 2252bis defines the separator as one or more spaces.

For the record, this is what I'm currently using in my implementation.
What separators are everyone else using ?

Regards,
Steven