[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-zeilenga-ldapv2-01.txt


Kurt,

Good enough for me.  Thanks for checking.

Tim Hahn

Internet: hahnt@us.ibm.com
Internal: Timothy Hahn/Endicott/IBM@IBMUS or IBMUSM00(HAHNT)
phone: 607.752.6388     tie-line: 8/852.6388
fax: 607.752.3681


"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

11/06/2001 06:49 PM

       
        To:        Timothy Hahn/Endicott/IBM@IBMUS
        cc:        ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
        Subject:        Re: I-D ACTION:draft-zeilenga-ldapv2-01.txt

       


At 12:21 PM 2001-11-06, Timothy Hahn wrote:
>My only concern with the document has to do with moving to RFC 2587 to historical.  Are there any other RFCs from the PKIX group that depend on RFC 2587?  If so, wouldn't moving 2587 to historical require them to be moved as well?

To the best of my knowledge (an egrep for RFC.*2587),
no Standard Track RFC is dependent on RFC 2587.  I do
note that PKIX (Chadwick/Legg) are writing an PKIX
LDAPv3 schema I-D which should pick up the pieces.

Kurt