[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-zeilenga-ldapv2-01.txt

To: "Timothy Hahn" <hahnt@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-zeilenga-ldapv2-01.txt
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 15:49:09 -0800
Cc: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <OF6EC0F5DA.3C5188BB-ON85256AFC.006E36C8@pok.ibm.com>

At 12:21 PM 2001-11-06, Timothy Hahn wrote:
>My only concern with the document has to do with moving to RFC 2587 to historical.  Are there any other RFCs from the PKIX group that depend on RFC 2587?  If so, wouldn't moving 2587 to historical require them to be moved as well?

To the best of my knowledge (an egrep for RFC.*2587),
no Standard Track RFC is dependent on RFC 2587.  I do
note that PKIX (Chadwick/Legg) are writing an PKIX
LDAPv3 schema I-D which should pick up the pieces.

Kurt

References:
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-zeilenga-ldapv2-01.txt
  - From: "Timothy Hahn" <hahnt@us.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Equally capable referrals
Next by Date: Re: Equally capable referrals
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread