Incomplete Syntaxes Referenced by RFC 2252

["Steven Legg" <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>]

All,

Is there any consensus on what is to be done about the syntaxes referenced
by the table in Section 4.3.2 RFC 2252, but not otherwise defined ?
Some syntaxes, like Delivery Method, have definitions in earlier LDAP RFCs,
which can presumably be incorporated into RFC 2252bis, but for some syntaxes
the only definitions for the string encoding I can find come from the long
expired draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-attributes-03.txt . Are these definitions
going to be tidied up and used, or will the syntaxes for these definitions
be
revised to always be transferred as ";binary" ?

Regards,
Steven