At 07:09 PM 2/8/01 +0100, Patrik Fältström wrote: > One should though have had a header line in 2255 which says "obsoletes: > 1959". Today, it says "replaces 1959" in the abstract. I'm more concerned that RFC 1959 doesn't have a header "Obsoleted by: RFC 2255" and RFC 1960 doesn't have a header "Obsoleted by: RFC 2254". Can these changes be made? Kurt