[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: LDAPbis Acknowledgement Policy
- To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Subject: Re: LDAPbis Acknowledgement Policy
- From: mcs@netscape.com (Mark C Smith)
- Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:56:17 -0500
- Cc: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
- Organization: iPlanet E-Commerce Solutions
- References: <5.0.0.25.0.20001221111514.021adeb0@router.boolean.net>
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
>
> To ensure WG documents appropriately and consistently
> give credit to WG document editors and authors, prior work
> document editors and authors, and individuals providing
> other significant contributions to WG documents, an
> acknowledge policy should be adopted. The following
> policy statement is offered by this co-chair:
>
> Each WG I-D shall list in the header the name and
> organization of the document editor and author(s)
> of the WG (revision) document. An author is an
> individual who has made a direct major contribution
> to the WG (revision) document.
I assume it is up to the document editor to determine what constitutes a
"major contribution." For example, technical review of changes by an
expert could be viewed as a major contribution.
Also, I think it would be useful to ask editors to put the word "Editor"
after their name in the header, e.g.,
Kurt D. Zeilenga, Editor
Joe Smith
Babs Jensen
> The document editor and author(s) of prior work(s)
> shall be credited in an Acknowledgement section.
Unless they are already listed in the new document in the header, etc.
> Other significant contributors to the (revision)
> document may be credited in the Acknowledgement
> section. Such credit should be in a separate
> paragraph from prior work(s) acknowledgements.
>
> A request from a named individual to be credited
> in the Acknowledgement section instead of the header
> or not to be credited shall be honored.
>
> This statement is based upon past LDAP revision/update
> acknowledge practices and is believed to be consistent
> with IETF policy and tradition.
>
> The WG chairs plan to make a decision on an acknowledgement
> policy within the next few weeks and solicits WG comments
> on this action. Please send your comments to this list
> or to the WG chairs by 10 January 2001.
Looks like I am one day late ;-)
--
Mark Smith
Directory Product Development / Netscape
My words are my own, not my employer's. Got LDAP?