[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Robustness of replication (was: Deleted DNs, and the great quest.)

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Subject: Robustness of replication (was: Deleted DNs, and the great quest.)
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:15:53 +0200
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <9673A50330C295D83E702340@[192.168.1.2]>
References: <4DB781A9.5000905@lundman.net> <9673A50330C295D83E702340@[192.168.1.2]>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110416 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> My only comment would be, if you want reliable replication, use
> delta-syncrepl.

This really strikes me.

1. CHANGES contains a lot of references to fixes made to syncrepl and
delta-syncrepl. And it seems not every issue is resolved yet.

2. delta-syncrepl cannot be used with multi-master replication.

So I wonder what are the really supported replication setups?

Ciao, Michael.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Robustness of replication (was: Deleted DNs, and the great quest.)
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

References:
- Deleted DNs, and the great quest.
  - From: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net>
- Re: Deleted DNs, and the great quest.
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Deleted DNs, and the great quest.
Next by Date: integrating a new overlay to the server
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread