[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Substrings in attributes - changing schemas

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Subject: Re: Substrings in attributes - changing schemas
From: Nick Milas <nick@eurobjects.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:51:28 +0200
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <4D3042D8.5050706@eurobjects.com>
References: <4D287ED8.7000205@eurobjects.com> <4D2CAF59.9090101@eurobjects.com> <F8E82E6AB805C0BD4979F185@[192.168.1.2]> <4D30342B.8000703@eurobjects.com> <hbf.20110114e845@bombur.uio.no> <4D303D25.4020708@eurobjects.com> <4D3042D8.5050706@eurobjects.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7

I know it gets frustrating, but after a new indexing (slapindex2.4), nowit works (exact matches, always with the initial schema) in v2.4.22 servers.


I am kind of totally confused now...

Nick

On 14/1/2011 2:34 μμ, Nick Milas wrote:

My tests were with openldap2.4.22.
(I have started to gradually migrate to current versions mainly due toIPv6 support in ACLs.)
On another server, where I still run v2.3.43-12.el5_5.3, the searchworks (without changing the schema):

References:
- Substrings in attributes - changing schemas
  - From: Nick Milas <nick@eurobjects.com>
- Re: Substrings in attributes - changing schemas
  - From: Nick Milas <nick@eurobjects.com>
- Re: Substrings in attributes - changing schemas
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: Substrings in attributes - changing schemas
  - From: Nick Milas <nick@eurobjects.com>
- Re: Substrings in attributes - changing schemas
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: Substrings in attributes - changing schemas
  - From: Nick Milas <nick@eurobjects.com>
- Re: Substrings in attributes - changing schemas
  - From: Nick Milas <nick@eurobjects.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Substrings in attributes - changing schemas
Next by Date: OpenLDAP delegates authentication to PAM
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread