Re: Two contextCSNs

[Peter Mogensen <apm@mutex.dk>]

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> By "writes" that would include anything changed by syncrepl.  I think 
> Howard's point is that server2 says it has received writes aka changes 
> from server1.  So the question is, what makes you think that server2 
> hasn't gotten said writes when it is reporting that it is?

As I said.
server2 does get the updated contextCSN from server1, but only the 
contectCSN. The data changes I make are not propagated.

/Peter