[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Segmentation Fault

To: openldap-software@openldap.org
Subject: Re: Segmentation Fault
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:42:16 -0800
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <48275.192.168.100.90.1172218296.squirrel@webmail.suretecsystems.com>
References: <68E146C6-D4E6-4ACE-A173-C95D0B324F09@wogri.com> <200702221445.47871.eveith@wwweb-library.net> <4627B924A877CCCAC3EF5B59@SW-90-717-287-3.stanford.edu> <48275.192.168.100.90.1172218296.squirrel@webmail.suretecsystems.com>

--On Friday, February 23, 2007 8:11 AM +0000 Gavin Henry <ghenry@suretecsystems.com> wrote:


Does anyone have Debian contacts to inform them of this, or are they fully
aware?

Debian is fully aware. Stanford and The Written Word have hired Symas to implement true GnuTLS support, so that this problem will go away.

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Segmentation Fault
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

References:
- Segmentation Fault
  - From: Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri@wogri.com>
- Re: Segmentation Fault
  - From: Eric MSP Veith <eveith@wwweb-library.net>
- Re: Segmentation Fault
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: Segmentation Fault
  - From: "Gavin Henry" <ghenry@suretecsystems.com>

Prev by Date: Re: WARNING: No dynamic config support for database ldbm
Next by Date: Re: Segmentation Fault
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread