[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: syncrepl'd MOD deleted(?) entry

To: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Subject: Re: syncrepl'd MOD deleted(?) entry
From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:09:27 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>, openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <439F676C.7050707@symas.com>
References: <Pine.SOL.4.58.0512131826380.17712@toolbox.rutgers.edu> <CF302586DC76B81B7752553F@cadabra-sw.stanford.edu> <439F676C.7050707@symas.com>

> Turn up debug on the slaves and watch what happens during the update...

At this point, I run "loglevel stats sync" in production. Is there
something else (short of -1) that would be sane to keep in regular
production? (Obviously, MODs work in isolated cases; otherwise I'd file
against "make test"?)

> At this stage, CVS HEAD and 2.3 are close enough that anyone can just
> pull the necessary patches out of HEAD.

I don't disagree, but at the same time, there's something comforting about
running a nice virgin tarball.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: syncrepl'd MOD deleted(?) entry
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

References:
- syncrepl'd MOD deleted(?) entry
  - From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
- Re: syncrepl'd MOD deleted(?) entry
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: syncrepl'd MOD deleted(?) entry
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

Prev by Date: Re: syncrepl'd MOD deleted(?) entry
Next by Date: Réf. : How can I build openldap on 64-bit machie?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread