RE: Cannot Index uniqueMember ( uniqueMemberMatch)

["Wachdorf, Daniel R" <drwachd@sandia.gov>]

I'm sorry, that should be:

http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin21/schema.html

-----Original Message-----
From: Wachdorf, Daniel R 
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:34 AM
To: 'Quanah Gibson-Mount'; Gary Allen (ldap); Wachdorf, Daniel R;
openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: RE: Cannot Index uniqueMember ( uniqueMemberMatch)

Yes it does:

EQUALITY uniqueMemberMatch

This matching rule is sported by openldap according to 
http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin22/schema.html


-----Original Message-----
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount [mailto:quanah@stanford.edu] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:20 AM
To: Gary Allen (ldap); Wachdorf, Daniel R; openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: Cannot Index uniqueMember ( uniqueMemberMatch)



--On Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:41 AM -0600 "Gary Allen (ldap)" 
<gvldap@corvu.com> wrote:

> Please correct me if I'm wrong but:
>
> I would guess (educated guess) that you cannot index on uniqueMember
> because it is a multi valued attribute.  Whereas, uid and cn are only
> single valued attributes (only one uid and cn are allowed within an
> entry).

You are wrong.  You can index multivalued attributes just fine.

The problem is that uniqueMember doesn't have an equality matching rule in 
the schema.

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/TSS/Computing Systems
ITSS/TSS/Infrastructure Operations
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html