Re: memory leak, or 'normal' behaviour?

[Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>]

--On Monday, March 15, 2004 3:10 PM +0100 Pierangelo Masarati 
<ando@sys-net.it> wrote:

> I tried 2.1 release code with simple bind (on Linux RH73)
> and I don't see any significant growth (steady, after some
> settlement) and no crash even without sleep.

Ando,

You might want to read his note closely -- He compiled against MIT 
Kerberos, which as I've stated at least 500 times already (well, maybe not 
quite *that* many), is full of memory leaks, and cannot handle threading at 
all.  His result in relation to the server crashing is exactly what one 
*should* expect.

--Quanah


--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/TSS/Computing Systems
ITSS/TSS/Infrastructure Operations
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html