Re: memory leak, or 'normal' behaviour?

["Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>]

>
>
> --On Monday, March 15, 2004 3:10 PM +0100 Pierangelo Masarati
> <ando@sys-net.it> wrote:
>
>> I tried 2.1 release code with simple bind (on Linux RH73)
>> and I don't see any significant growth (steady, after some
>> settlement) and no crash even without sleep.
>
> Ando,
>
> You might want to read his note closely -- He compiled against MIT
> Kerberos, which as I've stated at least 500 times already (well, maybe
> not  quite *that* many), is full of memory leaks, and cannot handle
> threading at  all.  His result in relation to the server crashing is
> exactly what one  *should* expect.

Sure.  I didn't expect it to be so bad...  anyway apparently
there are other people reporting at least leaks.  I wouldn't
bother too much about it, except that I see people restarting
the server overnight or even closer.

p.

-- 
Pierangelo Masarati
mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it